🌟 Elevate Your Connectivity Game!
The Netis DL4323 is a versatile 3-in-1 device that combines a high-speed ADSL2+ modem, a 4-port NAT router, and a wireless N access point, providing reliable internet access and connectivity for multiple devices. With speeds up to 300Mbps and advanced features like port mapping and IPv6 support, it’s designed for modern households that demand high performance and flexibility.
Wireless Type | 802.11n, 802.11b, 802.11g |
Brand | Netis |
Series | DL4323 |
Item model number | DL4323 |
Operating System | Windows, Linix, Mac OS |
Item Weight | 14.4 ounces |
Product Dimensions | 10.3 x 8.25 x 2.9 inches |
Item Dimensions LxWxH | 10.3 x 8.25 x 2.9 inches |
Voltage | 12 Volts |
Manufacturer | Netis |
ASIN | B00JYCJLEG |
Is Discontinued By Manufacturer | No |
Date First Available | January 7, 2014 |
G**G
Good insurance
This review is for "netis model DL4323 ADSL2+ Modem/Router". A number of recent and irritating, albeit infrequent, dropped connections while using my current 4-1/2 year old D-Link modem gave me concern that it may be starting to fail. Replacement options were very slim for this old technology but I was happy to find this netis modem/router. My particular situation does not require the wireless router since I only connect to a desktop PC so during setup I did not activate the router's Wi-Fi feature. I use the faster Ethernet cable. Setup from my AT&T DSL (pre-uverse) to my desktop computer (Windows 10) was straightforward, error free, and quick following the written Quick Installation Guide exactly. I downloaded it from the netis support website prior to purchase to make sure it would connect to my ISP. The Windows 10 connection wizard did not work. Several internet download and upload speed tests afterward seem to indicate about the same speeds as with my D-Link. As I use the netis now, if there are no more dropped connections I'll assume that the D-Link was near it's end-of-life. If there are more dropped connections I'll assume that the D-Link was not the culprit and something else is, maybe the AT&T DSL. In either case I've got some insurance with a backup modem that may not have been available if I had waited much longer. This review is primarily for the ease of setup as I have been using it for only a few days. Only time will tell if it lasts as long as my D-Link.
P**L
D iui snt work.
Tried to get this to work yo no avail. I have at&t dsl.
D**A
Centurylink DSL settings for Netis / curatel modem in NC
I purchased this modem as a replacement for one that was lightning damaged. It's not straightforward to setup, but it works with centurylink dsl.Here is how to set this modem up for centurylink dsl in eastern NC.Goto the Settings > Wlan page.Delete any existing entry in the WAN Interfaces Table.WAN Physical Type: Adsl wanVPI: 8VCI: 35Channel Mode: DHCP (Static ip)Enable NAPT: checkedIP Protocol: ipv4/ipv6WAN IP Settings:Type: DHCPDefault Route: EnableClick ADD and you should see a new entry in the WAN Interfaces Table with the ip address and isp gateway populated.Congratulations.
S**A
Not for Ziply DSL
I did a lot of research before getting this, and all the info online indicates it *should* work, but the Ziply tech spent an hour trying to get this to connect to the internet, with no success. In addition, he said for top speed I would need a dual band router, which this one isn't. So I ended up renting their router.Amazon sells dual band routers, but I can't recommend any particular one.
D**N
Nice little unit
I couldn't change the IP from 192.168.1.1 to ...0.0 which I think would have made it easier to setup with my cameras since they had static IPs. There were a lot of options - more than I knew about or how to set - but connecting to ISP and WiFi was easy. WAY smaller than any modem -router I ever had. I continued to have connection problems with the internet and then it went completely out. Turned out to be the ISP facilities and when they came out to fix them, they gave me a new modem so I sent this one back. Will order again in the future though.
C**S
Terrible router + high technical knowledge required to use
Short version: If you're stuck with DSL at home and are faced with a failing modem/router combo device today, don't buy this to replace it. Buy a cheaper DSL modem, and a good quality discrete router (TPLink AC1750 is a good place to start looking) to solve and future-proof your home network. It'll cost more in the end but be worth every bit of it.Long, detailed version:I would get cable or especially fiber internet if I could. But DSL is all that's available to me. As a dying standard, finding DSL "gateways" (modem and router combination devices like this) is extremely difficult without buying used gear. With my previous hardware having gone to advanced states of failure, I had no choice but to try, and this was what was most readily available.I have AT&T residential DSL service (non-uVerse edition, specifically) and it is compatible with that. But the automatic set up doesn't work. It never detected any information from the incoming signal in order to configure essential settings to access the service. I had to manually input all of the values and set up my internet connection from scratch, essentially. Thankfully I already know all of that information and have the understanding and experience to be able to enter it in the correct places. Many people would not.I consider myself a fairly advanced user (which is probably obvious by now) but even with a higher than average knowledge in this area, the interface for the router is borderline baffling. It's extremely unintuitive, and throws a huge amount of very technical options with absolutely no explanation of what any of it means or theoretically does. It seems to be expecting very advanced, professional-level comprehension of the ins-and-outs of DSL network interfaces, which is simply not realistic for a piece of low-cost consumer hardware.The actual performance of the device is something else though. As a DSL modem, which is to say the thing that receives the signal from the phone line and translates it for a computer to work with, it seems to work just fine. It doesn't lose the signal or anything like that from my experience. But that's only a certain portion of this thing's job. The other is to be a router, providing that internet connection to a home network. And it is incredibly terrible at it.I don't want to make this too technical, because it gets in to things like "packets" and "buffers" and the like. The functional result is that it can't adequately deal with anything but the most basic internet activity. Anything that you need "real time" connectivity for, like a Zoom or Skype call, online gaming, or even something as basic as watching streaming video, it can't handle it without severe loss of performance. It is literally unusable for even voice calls online, and video conferencing is completely out of the question thanks to severe lag/latency and highly degraded outgoing voice and video quality.The way it's designed appears to lack the capacity to competently prioritize traffic to let things like voice and video calls get first dibs on the internet connection. It treats everything exactly equal, and an internet connection just can't work that way. It's a bizarre disparity in this device, where the set up and interface require sophisticated technical knowledge, but it can only provide the most basic look-at-facebook functionality no matter what you do. And it genuinely is no matter what. I spent three weeks of every spare moment fighting with this to work out a configuration of its many settings that would resolve the problems, and there simply was none.The device comes with no documentation other than a startup guide which tells you nothing, and there is no additional documentation online, nor is there even a discernible user base for this particular device where you might seek help from others. You are entirely on your own.Now, to be fair, the wifi signal it provides to a home network is strong and stable, and there are various protocol, frequency band, and channel options available to help in case you live where there's a lot of wifi congestion. But while it's good at delivering the signal even in difficult conditions, it doesn't really matter if that signal can't give you solid internet performance.I fought with this so long I ran out the return period. It was unusable for me as it came, so I had to make the best of the money I'd already spent. By spending more money... I'm currently using this in what's called "bridge mode" which means I'm only using its DSL modem component, and I connected it to a separate router (one without its own modem) to run my home network through. This configuration works very very well, but I had to spend in total about three times the list price of this device in order to get a system in place that worked as expected.There's little or no reason to buy this. Flat out, there is not a cheap way to replace an aging-out DSL gateway if that situation befalls you. The best thing to do is to get a discrete DSL modem, and a separate router to make sure you can get the functionality you need and/or are used to. This can be that modem if it comes down to it, but you can, for now at least, still get basic DSL modems cheaper than this. And you absolutely should.
Trustpilot
2 days ago
1 month ago