TP-Link EAP610 Ultra-Slim Wireless Access Point for Business | Omada True Wi-Fi 6 AX1800 | DC Adapter Included | Mesh, Seamless Roaming, WPA3, MU-MIMO | Remote & App Control | PoE+ Powered

As with other TP-link wall access points, this one performs well, having good range despite being small and fixed next to a metal wall box. It provides as much coverage as the larger Tp-link ceiling access points. It's a 3-port switch as well.Perfect for upgrading an office, home or work, from a single network point. Also, with a few of them, a jolly neat way of providing coverage in a larger house.The only reservation is price but I suppose TP-link sets it at that level because there is simply no competition.

Has given us WiFi in part of the house which could only get minimum signal. Now getting 500 meg it's even faster than the WiFi down stairs

I purchased this product to boost WIFI signal in a large house. It is advertised as Power Over Ethernet but this is not the case. The technical support received by Quzo has been zero! Very disappointing

Gerência diversos cenários, inclusive para rede de convidados, restringindo e o acesso à rede do cliente.

han funcionado muy bien para una casa

The TP-Link EAP610 access points have transformed my home office network. After switching from a Nighthawk CAX80, these APs provide superior wireless coverage and performance. The Wi-Fi 6 technology ensures fast and stable connections, even with multiple devices connected. Setting up the access points was straightforward, and they work flawlessly with the TP-Link Omada controller. The improved security features give me confidence in my network's safety. Overall, the EAP610 access points are an excellent investment for anyone looking to upgrade their Wi-Fi network.

Great access point and range for indoor use. The white status LED is not too bright at night and the 3 ports on the bottom are great for connecting additional devices if needed. Easy to mount to a standard single-gang electrical/data box.This was installed as part of an Omada deployment for a campground guest WiFi network that was replacing aging/outdated Ubiquiti equipment. Coupled with outdoor WiFi 6 EAP610s, these indoor units were used in trailers and campers that had weak signal from the outdoor units. Overall, these are great APs for short range needs like single rooms and small areas and works just fine. However, there is an overall flaw with all Omada APs regarding guest networking that was confirmed by TP-Link engineers that is important to note.TP-Link Omada access points of any flavor do not support Layer 2 client isolation. Even with guest network settings applied in the controller (or on the AP itself if using standalone), Layer 2 communication between clients still works despite not being able to ping those devices or reach any kind of a webpage or open port. While the guest settings do block the above types of client access, multicast packets still flow freely and everywhere. As such, our guest campground network let anyone anywhere wirelessly cast their screen via AirPlay, Google Cast, or Miracast to anyone's unsuspecting smart TV without warning. That is a huge security issue not to mention asking for problems to occur, so unfortunately I was left no choice but to return all of the Omada units and return to Ubiquiti equipment.With that being said, if that is not an issue for you, they work great in any other environment that does not require L2 isolation. they boot up incredibly quick, offer good signal and speed, and overall are a great product for the price. After escalating this issue with support, I was eventually put in touch with their engineering team running diagnostics with them and submitting Wireshark logs to get to the root of the problem. They said it would be added to a list for future firmware development, but I cannot wait for that to happen. It was upsetting to leave TP-Link because I know for a fact I would not get this kind of support with Ubiquiti (part of the reason I was trying to leave that ecosystem), but I didn't have much choice.

(Note: this review is geared toward home consumers with a single unit in mind, not businesses)I have a router from my ISP that has wireless and wired ethernet ports that I've been using for the last few years. Lately, after I'd added yet more 'smart' bulbs and plugs and audio streamers to my network, I noticed that my Chromecast was having trouble keeping up, no matter how low I set the picture resolution (kept running out of buffer).At first, I thought it was the streaming device itself. On a lark, I ordered this up, figuring that the Chromecast might run better off an ethernet port with a WAP connected to it (that's 'wireless access point'; get your mind out the gutter... lol).Sure enough, with this installed, and the Chromecast reconfig'd to use the new WAP as its network... all latency problems are gone. Meanwhile, my old existing network is now free to handle the rest of my traffic, without the Chromecast choking to death. Tests via the 'stats for nerds' within Chromecast showed a speed bump from maybe 2K bps, to 10K bps through the ethernet connection. No more buffering problems whatsover, even at 1080p.Setup is fairly easy. The manufacturer has a phone-based app that can do the setup and control. Just note that when it starts up, it defaults to the non-consumer setup. Switch it over, and with the WAP powered on (and your phone connected to your home network), it will discover your WAP. However, you'll still need to enter the 20-character SSID that's on the back of the unit, into the app. That's in small print, so you'll want a magnifier--or, better yet, also record it (phone, paper, etc.), so that if you ever need it again, you'll have it.These are designed to be mounted high up -- ceilings or walls. The unit comes with a wall wart (unless you connect this to a PoE-enabled device, you'll need this). It does come with a mounting plate. I haven't mounted mine yet; it's working just fine as I'm testing it out before mounting.Except for that minor issue with the control app, having to switch it over every time you start it... the rest of this turned out to be a great solution to my issue. Yes, I paid $100 for a WAP (again, NOT what Cardi B sings about), but that's cheaper than upgrading my internet service with a higher fixed cost every month, new equipment, etc. At some point, I expect the radio to go out in my router (this is what the 'wireless' is called, in hardware). But until then... this will serve just fine for my needs.